S+L logo

Silence: The space for deep communication

February 6, 2012
January 24th was the feast day of St. Francis de Sales – patron of journalists and communicators – and the occasion Pope Benedict chose to announce the Church’s message for World Communications Day 2012.  The message is an interesting one, highlighting the importance of silence as a crucial variable in effective and meaningful communication.  “In silence,” says Benedict, “we are able to listen to and understand ourselves; ideas come to birth and acquire depth; we understand with greater clarity what it is we want to say and what we expect from others; and we choose how to express ourselves.”
From this address, we are encouraged to acknowledge the influx of stimuli received on a daily basis, much of which is presented aggressively, and to take time to silently contemplate the things communicated to us.  If this is done sincerely, the act of silence is seen, not as an absence of communication, but an integral part of it.  So often it is in silent contemplation where our future actions are discerned and clarified.  An example of this can be seen in this past Sunday’s gospel (Mk 1:29-39), where Jesus gets up early in the morning and goes off by himself to a deserted place to pray.  When his disciples finally find him and tell him that everyone in town is looking for him, he replies, “Let us go on to the neighboring towns, so that I may proclaim the message there also; for that is what I came out to do.”  Jesus, like all of us, had to discern his mission, and found the strength and courage to do so in silence.
But there is another form of silence that is important to note here because of its compelling and compulsory nature; I mean the shattering silence that for a moment makes our world stand still, and sometimes changes it forever.  This past week I read an article in the National Catholic Reporter by Desmond Fisher about the horror among the Curia when in 1959 Pope John XXIII announced his intention to call an ecumenical council.  The reaction of the pope’s closest advisors is unforgettable: as John recalled, “There was a devout and impressive silence.”  No one could have foreseen that event, the ramifications of which would change the course of history (and will continue to do so).  And in such a moment, given the context of the time, what words were possible?  Barring judgment, the utter silence of the Curia spoke for itself.
Take another example.  When in 1534 King Henry VIII pushed the Act of Supremacy through parliament, rejecting papal authority and declaring himself the supreme head of the Church in England, there were few protests from among the bureaucracy.  But the Lord Chancellor, Thomas More, known in his time as a man of great dignity, refrained from taking the official oath which acknowledged the validity of the Act, and invoked the legal tenet that “silence presumes consent.”  Every government and church official knew More’s position on the matter.  What other means of communication but silence could have resounded through the realm with such magnitude?  It would take a political careerist to perjure himself before a high council for Henry to elicit the necessary “evidence” to condemn More, and he was executed for high treason on July 6, 1535, in his own words, “the king’s good servant, but God’s first.”  To this day Thomas More is revered for his strength of conscience and steadfastness against the whims of a self-interested king.
But perhaps the greatest example comes from the story of the greatest event; namely, the resurrection of Jesus.  If we study the ending of Mark’s gospel – the earliest of the four – we are struck by an abrupt halt to the story.  What is called “The Longer Ending” (Mk 16:9-20) is absent from our earliest manuscripts, suggesting one of two things: either it was lost, or it was never there.  In the latter case, it may be presumed that early on (around the beginning of the second century) the Church “completed” Mark’s account for its own pastoral and doctrinal reasons.  But if we read the gospel as it ends at 16:8, we are presented once again with a profound silence.  The women who came to the tomb to anoint the body are met by a young man who tells them that Jesus has been raised and is going ahead of them to Galilee.  We are told that the women flee the tomb immediately, and with trembling and bewilderment say nothing to anyone – silence.  Can there be any other reaction?  What use are words at such a moment?
When we struggle to incorporate silence into our lives it might be useful to read Mark’s passion account.  It is imperative that we are reminded of that moment at the tomb on a daily basis, which is really the central moment of the whole Faith.  If nothing else, doesn’t a mere thought of the resurrection turn that influx of stimuli to dust?  It is worth pondering, in silence.
Related posts
Second Sunday of Lent, Year B – February 25th, 2018 Moriah. Sinai. Nebo. Carmel. Horeb. Gilboa. Gerizim. Mount of Beatitudes. Tabor. Hermon. Zion. Mount of Olives. Calvary. Golgotha. Mountains a ...read more
The Ways of the Desert
FacebookTwitter
Reflection for First Sunday of Lent Year B by Fr. Thomas Rosica, CSB This lent, Salt and Light brings you Lenten Reflections from Fr. Thomas Rosica who is the CEO of Salt and Light Catholic Media Foun ...read more
First Sunday of Lent, Year B – February 18th, 2018 Does anyone really look forward to Lent? What is it about Lent that excites us? What aspects of the Lenten journey test us? The Scriptural read ...read more
Biblical Reflection for Ash Wednesday – February 14th, 2018 On Ash Wednesday the Church begins her great Lenten journey with Jesus on the road to Jerusalem. For centuries, Lent has been a very i ...read more
Let Us Not Fear the Sepulchres of This Earth
FacebookTwitter
Sixth Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year B – February 11th, 2018 The first reading for this Sunday outlines the harsh laws for people with skin diseases usually labeled correctly or incorrectly as a ...read more